| NORMAN
MAILER APPROACHES 80 AND HAS A NEW BOOK OUT
Jan.
27 issue — The
Spooky Art, Norman Mailer’s book about writing, will appear on
Jan. 31, his 80th birthday. Since his debut novel, “The Naked and the
Dead” (1948), Mailer has written 31 more books. He has won the
Pulitzer Prize twice. He has directed four films and written 10
screenplays. He has been married six times and has nine children.
HE WAS ONCE ARRESTED for stabbing his second wife. He ran for mayor
of New York twice. He helped found The Village Voice. He has arthritis
in his knees and sometimes walks with two canes. His voice is roughly
musical, like a man gargling marbles. With his wife, the artist and
novelist Norris Church Mailer, he lives in a brick house beside the
ocean in Provincetown, Mass., where he recently sat down for an
interview with NEWSWEEK. He does not like interviews.
NEWSWEEK: You were once a
fixture on the New York literary scene. Now you live here in
Provincetown year-round?
MAILER: Yes, mainly because
I can get more work done here. And I love the town. It’s probably the
freest place on the Eastern Seaboard. It’s got a long tradition,
starting with pirates and smugglers. And the Pilgrims. But there really
is something easy here. Nobody gives a damn what you do. Or what you
did. Nobody’s that taken with your importance.
Can you say a little about the
novel you’re working on?
I’m not going to talk about that
novel, because I’d talk it away. I won’t even mention the subject.
But I’ve got about 200 pages written on it, and it’ll probably keep
me busy for the rest of my writing years—at least. It’s as ambitious
as anything I’ve ever tackled. Writing novels is physically damaging.
On the other hand, what I have is, you might say, more craft and less
smoke.
Have there been books before
that you knew better than to talk about?
No. People weren’t that
interested. When I was doing that book on Egypt [“Ancient
Evenings”], they were saying, “Oh ... how very ... interesting.”
But this would be impossible to keep quiet about. I mean, if I were
writing—which I’m obviously not—about George W. Bush’s secret
sex life, and I mentioned that, how could questions not follow?
The Bush amours might be a short book.
We don’t know. I think it would
be damned impressive if he has a secret sex life. A very intelligent
woman was talking to me about Bill Clinton’s troubles and said, “You
know, he really was like a prisoner, ‘cause every 15 seconds the
Secret Service would be clocking him.” If you’re a convict—and he
was in the finest minimum-security prison in the world—then your pride
is to beat the system. So he had to do it, for his own manliness. After
all, we do want a manly president, don’t we? Yet look what happened,
now we’ve got one.
So what do you make of Iraq?
Leaving aside all the usual
explanations—the oil, the fact that if the people in power in this
country win they will then have this commanding position in the Near
East—forgetting all that, the fact is, that war could just go on and
on and on. But I don’t think that bothers our leaders very much. I
think they kind of like the idea that if the country gets very military,
then they can stop all the “frees”—free love, gay liberation,
women’s liberation, all the things they detest. There’s no question
that the level of uncertainty, the absence of absolutes, has probably
never been greater. So the longer the danger goes on, the longer they
have to create a new kind of society. We’re in for curious times.
Do writers need things to chafe
against?
Probably. Ah, we pearls.
In the new book, you
argue against any distinction between fiction and nonfiction.
I say that it’s all fiction,
yeah. Working on “The Executioner’s Song,” I wanted it to be as
accurate as I could possibly make it. And yet when I was done, a couple
of major figures in it were unhappy. I loved [Gary Gilmore’s
girlfriend] Nicole, for example, but I gather she thought, “That’s
not me.” So I thought, all right, it is a novel. I think it’s
very good to get rid of the notion that because you’ve accumulated
some facts, therefore you’re factual.
How’s your health?
My knees are no good. But I really
think the key thing as you get older is that you learn to cleanse
yourself of self-pity. And, of course, I have certain religious beliefs
that make it easier. I don’t have this liberal, rational certainty,
thank God, that once you die you die, and that’s the end of it. On the
contrary, I believe in a form of karma, I believe in reincarnation—not
for everyone! I think reincarnation is a reward of a sort. Where we go
is another matter.
Another great thing about getting
older—’cause it isn’t all great—is that you get much more
efficient and economical in terms of what you want to do. You no longer
want to be president of the United States or have everyone in the world
say you’re the greatest writer who’s ever lived. You know it’s
nonsense now. You’re in the lap of history. You could easily be
forgotten in 20, 30, 40 years. There’s no telling and it’s not
important, since you will not be there.
You finally come down to something
that Elia Kazan said once. He said, “Everybody makes fun of us at the
Actors Studio because we talk about the work, the work. Well, the work
is important. In fact, work is a blessing.” That stayed with me
forever. The ability to work when you get old is a firm pleasure.
Reading through interviews you’ve done, I see why you don’t
like them. Most of them seem to use your past like a stick to poke at an
old lion between the bars. They want you to tell about stabbing your
second wife. And about helping to get the writer Jack Henry Abbott out
of jail, only to have him kill someone.
Yeah, those are the two big ones.
Then they go off and say nice things about you. But they can’t say
nice things until they’ve done that. Jack Henry Abbott—that was
awful, but it was a costly reflection on one’s innocence, not one’s
evil. But the stabbing was inexcusable. And since I was not punished for
it in any real way—I had to do a couple of years of probation, which
is onerous, but certainly no punishment—there are people who think I
got off easy. And they may be right. I believe you really do pay for
your f—-ups, and you pay very hard after you die. There’s no doubt
in my mind that I will pay for that one.
I feel rueful about Jack Henry
Abbott. A lot of guys stayed in prison because thereafter the parole
boards were afraid to pass ‘em out a year or two earlier, and for that
I bear part of the responsibility. But I don’t feel guilty about
getting him out. What I feel guilty about is that I’d just finished
“The Executioner’s Song.” I knew how tough it is when a man gets
out of prison. And I was a good fellow, his Uncle Norman, having him
over to the house for dinner. I even let a couple of my daughters go out
to movies with him, because I knew he’d be totally honorable. But I
also knew that he needed someone to work through the tough spots with
him. And I didn’t want to do it, because I wanted to do my own work,
and I didn’t want to take on the huge responsibility of being around a
guy who was very depressed. Why was he depressed? Because they made him
rat before they let him out. We didn’t know that. Everyone was
treating him like a hero, because of this wonderful book he’d written
[“In the Belly of the Beast”]. And he was thinking, they think I’m
a hero, and I’m a rat. And so he was terribly depressed, and you
didn’t want to be around him. So I didn’t do my duty.
In the new book, you say that
the things you’ve hated most in your life have all triumphed.
I listed plastic, superhighways,
high-rise architecture, which is an abomination of everything. Those are
the three. And the platitudes of politicians have only gotten worse.
I’ve been saying for a while—and it drives most American patriots
mad with rage—that the country has gotten more loutish. And maybe the
whole world has been getting that way, because we’ve been exporting
that loutishness. It’s one of our great cultural commodities: crap.
Has anything gotten better?
I think journalism has gotten better—the writing has.
There’s no doubt in my mind that The New York Times is better written
today than it was 40 years ago.
The novel has not exactly
gotten better. The novel has been dwindling since the end of the 19th
century, because of one inescapable fact, which is that it is no longer
as essential to people’s cultural lives as it used to be. The movies
replaced it, certainly, and television. Novelists have lost the sense
that we make a difference. It used to be, you could get into some
absolute extravagances of vanity. Like, I really believed at one point
that I had been a true factor in getting JFK elected president in 1960.
It took me a long time to realize that Mayor Daley had a lot more to do
with it.
But there are more and more skilled
novelists today. Their themes get smaller, for the most part, but their
techniques and talents get more and more refined. Jonathan Franzen is
the arch example. He could become a great writer, he’s got the stuff.
I don’t know that he’s willing to pay the price. Because with the
talent he’s got, he’s like a certain kind of wealthy man: he’s not
going to try to become a billionaire. That describes most authors.
Do you still do the crossword
puzzle every morning to get going?
Oh, yeah.
In pencil or ink?
Ink. I do that and a solitaire
game. My wife naturally began to look on all this and wonder, Who am I
married to? If there’s anything that distresses women, it’s habits
they do not pursue themselves. So I looked at her, and I said, “You
have to understand, this is how I comb my brain every morning.”
Actually, I’m not that good at
crossword puzzles. I can’t do the Saturday puzzle in The New York
Times to save my life. And I’m hurt that I’m never in one of them.
And I’ve got a last name with three vowels. You’d think I’d be hot
cakes, but I’m not.
© 2003 Newsweek, Inc.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing
elit, sed diem nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut lacreet dolore magna
aliguam erat volutpat. Ut wisis enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud
exerci tution ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis te feugifacilisi. Duis autem dolor in hendrerit
in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat
nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui
blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit au gue duis dolore te feugat
nulla facilisi. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci taion
ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex en commodo consequat.
Duis te feugifacilisi per suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex en
commodo consequat.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing
elit, sed diem nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut lacreet dolore magna
aliguam erat volutpat. Ut wisis enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud
exerci tution ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat.
Duis te feugifacilisi. Duis autem dolor in hendrerit
in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat
nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui
blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit au gue duis dolore te feugat
nulla facilisi. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci taion
ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex en commodo consequat.
Duis te feugifacilisi per suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex en
commodo consequat.
Duis te feugifacilisi. Duis autem dolor in hendrerit
in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat
nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui
blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit au gue duis dolore te feugat
nulla facilisi. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci taion
ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex en commodo consequat.
Duis te feugifacilisi per suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex en
commodo consequat. |
|
| A
Taste of ‘The Spooky Art’ |
 |
Excerpts
from Norman Mailer’s book
about writing |
|
Jan.
27 issue — When I was younger, I used to
consider a bad review a personal insult ... In fact
... I have never actually punched out a reviewer,
which I say with a certain wistfulness. |
Writers aren’t taken seriously anymore, and a large
part of the blame must go to the writers of my generation, most
certainly including myself. We haven’t written the books that should
have been written. We’ve spent too much time exploring ourselves. We
haven’t done the imaginative work that could have helped define
America ... We just expand all over the place, and this spread is about
as attractive as collapsed and flabby dough on a stainless steel table.
Over the years, I’ve found one rule ... It’s a simple rule. If you
tell yourself you are going to be at your desk tomorrow, you are ...
asking your unconscious to prepare the material ... If you wake up in
the morning with a hangover ... your unconscious, after a few such
failures to appear, will withdraw.
The 20th century artist who conceivably had the most influence on my
work was not a writer but Picasso. He kept changing the nature of his
attack on reality. It’s as if he felt there is a reality to be found
out there but it’s not a graspable object like a rock. Rather, it is a
creature who keeps changing shape.
We tell ourselves stories in order to make sense of life. Narrative
is reassuring. There are days when life is so absurd, it’s
crippling—nothing makes sense, but stories bring order to the
absurdity. Relief is provided by the narrative’s beginning, middle and
end.
Since at my age you begin to forget all too much, I ... hardly remember
what I had written the day before. It read, therefore, as if someone
else had done it ... I could now proceed to fix the prose. The sole
virtue of losing your short-term memory is that it does free you to be
your own editor.
© 2003 Newsweek, Inc.
|